Review recurrence: Is the newest Netflix movie worth watching?

Recurrence, Alejandro Montiel’s most recent crime thriller, picks up Pipa’s (Luisana Lopilato) story some years after the events in Intuition (2020), but with a significantly altered setting and basic concept. The film jumps right into the major issue after an exciting opening scene in La Quebrada, in the north of Argentina. However, everything loses momentum after that.

The main character in the movie is Pipa, a farmer seeking to lead a peaceful life and raise her son without interference. Though she has been evading it for ten years, she eventually finds herself in the heart of a murder investigation. According to the unclear premise, there was a lot of unrest in the town, corrupt law enforcement, and hostile regional tribes. In any case, the movie was a complete failure.

Ex-cop Pipa is drawn back into the sinister world she thought she had left behind after relocating to a small town and being involved in a murder investigation.

The movie had its Netflix debut on July 27, 2022. Review of Recurrence is below.

Review of a previous episode: Weak characters sabotage an intriguing plot.

The movie wanders in a clichéd way by establishing a crisis where the lead character is compelled to employ her abilities from the police force, as it follows the life of retired Detective Pipa in exile. Hollywood has witnessed this numerous times, most recently in the Jeff Bridges television series The Old Man.

It wouldn’t be accurate to state that a film can’t be entertaining unless the idea is new each time. It does contribute to the film’s originality, yet a simple concept might nevertheless result in a fantastic movie. Just that Recurrence did not succeed in doing so.

For viewers who have not seen the first two movies in the series, the movie can be very perplexing at points and provides hardly any background. In addition, the characters come across as horribly underdeveloped and overbearing. At times, the action moves too quickly, which could leave viewers wondering how a particular narrative is developing.

The movie attempted to move quickly, which is a usual strategy for thriller movies, but it turned out to be a jumble of weak plotlines. Most of the time, the movie is unclear, and other times it is extremely predictable. Additionally, there is a problem with the overabundance of subplots. Every story needs subplots to function properly. Sometimes they are able to improve a movie on their own. However, Recurrence featured so many subplots that it was frequently confusing.

Despite being a well-worn tale, it held promise. It is the sort of tale that audiences enjoy and value. But the absence of a strong hero or antagonist rendered the movie overly uninteresting. Viewers will find it difficult to empathize with any side while watching.

The movie also had plenty of opportunities to use the beauty of nature as a surplus in its cinematography, but it squandered those opportunities. Although the camera work is good, it might be much better. Not true of the sound design, which was blatantly inadequate. The sound design, as a whole, overcompensated and was excessively dense, piled with elements.

Should you see Recurrence, in conclusion?

Really, it’s better to stay away from this movie. New viewers won’t find anything in the movie. Even if it’s a disappointing finish, it might offer viewers who have previously followed Pipa’s narrative a satisfying one. Other than that, there aren’t many reasons to see an almost two-hour movie in one sitting.

Netflix is now streaming Recurrence.

Leave a Comment

error: Content is protected !!