Jeffery Dahmer: Who Is He? Why Was He Not Allowed to Stay in The Military? Did He Commit a Murder There?
The documentary titled “Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” that can be found on Netflix explains how Jeffrey Dahmer was able to get away with the murder of seventeen people for as long as he did. The audience is made aware, through the show’s depiction of a variety of instances, of how close the serial killer had come to being apprehended on multiple occasions. There were also occasions when it would not have been difficult to put a stop to his actions; instead, the court system seems to have failed the victims at every turn. Even though Dahmer admitted to killing seventeen people, the fact that he was able to kill someone and get away with it so easily makes one question whether or not the actual number of people he killed was actually lower than the confession he made. The length of time that passed between his first murder and his second is particularly noteworthy because of the significance of this gap. Following the commission of his first murder, Dahmer joined the military a few months later. Did something go place at that location? Why did his tour of duty in the army have to be cut short? Let’s find out.
How Long Did Jeffrey Dahmer Serve in the Military Before He Was Arrested?
After receiving his diploma, Dahmer was at a loss as to what he should do with the rest of his life. Lionel Dahmer, his father, put him through college by sending him to Ohio State University, where the younger Dahmer intended to study business. On the other hand, he never exhibited a great deal of sincerity regarding college, and his grades had been appalling. Dahmer left Oregon State University after only three months of enrollment, despite the fact that his father had already paid for the second term. Because of his growing drinking problem and the uncertainty surrounding his future, Lionel encouraged him to enlist in the military. Dahmer entered in the military in January of 1979 and had his medical specialized training at Fort Sam Houston, which is located in San Antonio, Texas. In July of 1979, he was stationed in Baumholder, which was located in West Germany. He was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 68th Armored Regiment, 8th Infantry Division, and served in the capacity of a combat medic. He did so until 1981, when he was finally given an honorable discharge from the military duty he had been in.
Why Jeffrey Dahmer was discharged from the military?
Alcoholism was already a problem for Dahmer before he enlisted in the military, and he struggled with it for quite some time. The man’s father had thought that his son’s service in the military would be of some assistance to him in this regard, but he was mistaken. The severity of Dahmer’s drinking problem increased over time, which had a domino effect on his overall performance. Because to his long-term alcoholism, he was eventually given an honorable discharge from the service in March 1981, in accordance with Chapter 9 of the Code of Military Justice. This occurred one year before the end of his initial three-year enlistment. Although his drinking rendered him unfit for military service, it was believed that the challenges he faced while serving in the military would not be relevant to his everyday life after he returned home. He arrived to Fort Jackson, South Carolina, on the 24th of March, 1981, after having been sent there. Following the debriefing, he was given a plane ticket with the option to travel anywhere in the world. He made the decision to go to Miami Beach, Florida, and he remained there for the next couple of months before moving back to Ohio to be with his family.
Did Jeffrey Dahmer commit any murders?
goes to Inside Edition/YouTube.After the news of Dahmer’s murders became public in 1991, the Army made the decision to investigate the length of time he had served in the military and to look into whether or not any of the unresolved crimes from the era were connected to him. In a similar fashion, the police in Germany examined the investigations around the time when Dahmer was in the nation to determine whether or not any crimes fit the pattern and could possibly be connected to him. They came up empty-handed in their search.
It was later discovered that Dahmer had sexually abused two men when he was serving in the Army. Despite the fact that no unsolved deaths or disappearances could be attributed to him, this information was shocking. In Germany, he was assigned to the same medical unit as a man named Preston Davis, who was 20 years old at the time and claimed that Dahmer had raped and drugged him. He was at a loss to recall the specifics of what had taken place, but he was grateful “to be alive to tell the story.” After the traumatic event, Preston moved on to serve in a different unit, but the effects of the trauma continued to linger in his life and damaged both his personal and professional endeavors.
After Davis left, Dahmer’s next victim of sexual assault was Billy J. Capshaw, who was only 17 years old. Billy J. Capshaw was Dahmer’s bunkmate. Capshaw, in contrast to Davis, was subjected to the serial killer’s abuse for a significantly longer period of time. He claimed that when Dahmer was sober, he was a good guy, but when he got drunk, he turned into a dangerous and violent person. He said that Dahmer had been a nice guy when he was sober. “I don’t remember how many times I was raped, but it was probably between eight and ten. He was using the rope from the motor pool to bind me to the bunk. He stripped every piece of clothing off of me. He would hit me either before or after he raped me, according to what he told me, but he would never beat me in between.
After Capshaw reported Dahmer, he was transported to the dispensary for a test using a rape kit, but after that, nothing further occurred to him. Dahmer proceeded to commit assaults for the next seventeen months despite the fact that no action was taken against him. Capshaw remarked about his superiors that “they tossed me to the dogs,” and this was especially true after he learned much further down the road that the findings of the test had been destroyed. In the episode of “Dahmer on Dahmer” that aired on Oxygen, both Viola Davis and Kate Capshaw talked about their experiences with Jeffrey Dahmer. They are now buddies and support other people who have survived sexual abuse in the military.
History Of Serial Murder
Throughout history, there have been instances of serial murder. One of the earliest examples that was documented involves a Roman woman named Locusta. Locusta was paid by Agrippina the Younger, who was Nero’s mother, to poison numerous members of the imperial family. Locusta was put to death in the year 69 CE. Additionally, there is evidence of serial killings taking place in medieval England, Germany, Hungary, and Italy. It is possible that the charges against the French baron Gilles de Rais, who was executed in the 15th century for the murder of more than one hundred children, served as the inspiration for the fictional character Bluebeard. However, it is unclear whether the allegations made against him were accurate. Even while it is highly possible that there is a similarly lengthy history of serial murder in Asia and other regions of the world, documentary evidence of early occurrences is difficult to come by and is fraught with controversy.
The known incidence of serial murder increased dramatically in the early 19th century, particularly in Europe. However, this development has been attributed to advancements in law-enforcement techniques and increased news coverage rather than to an actual rise in the number of occurrences of serial murders. In the early 19th century, serial killers included a German woman who killed more than a dozen people by poisoning them, two men born in Ireland named William Burke and William Hare who killed at least 15 people in Scotland in the 1820s, and an Austrian woman who allegedly fed her family members the flesh of murdered children. In the 19th century, the most notorious case of serial murder was that of Jack the Ripper, who was responsible for the deaths of at least five women in London in the year 1888. Shortly after that, the United States documented the similarly dramatic case of Herman Webster Mudgett, also known as “H.H. Holmes,” who confessed to 27 separate murders and was ultimately put to death in Philadelphia in the year 1896.
Cases of serial murder gained extensive coverage in the news media during the 20th century. Some killers became notorious due to the colorful nicknames that were given to them, such as the Boston Strangler, the Monster of Florence, the Killer Clown, and Peter Kürten, also known as the Düsseldorf Vampire (John Wayne Gacy). Their murders, which terrified and captivated the public in equal measure, brought to light a number of social and legal issues, such as the tendency of the police to be less thorough in murder investigations when the victims were poor or of low social position.
The concept of serial murder was the impetus for a great number of best-selling books published in the 20th century, and by the 1980s, it had effectively become its own subgenre of crime writing. Films revolving around serial killers have been solid box office draws, and these movies can range from critically lauded to more predictable in their storytelling. M (1931), The Devil Strikes at Night (1958), Peeping Tom (1960), Psycho (1960), Silence of the Lambs (1991), and Monster (2003) were examples of films that belonged to the first category, whereas Halloween (1978) and Friday the 13th were examples of films that belonged to the second category (1980). The German playwright Frank Wedekind created the character Jack the Ripper for use in several of his plays, including Pandora’s Box (1904) and others. The work of Wedekind served as the inspiration for Alban Berg’s opera Lulu, which was first performed in 1937.
Some scholars and authors are disheartened by the public’s obsession with stories about serial murder because they see it as an indicator of the intellectual and moral degradation of Western (and particularly American) civilization. Some people, including some psychiatrists, have arrived to the opposite conclusion. They contend that tales of this type are genuinely morally edifying because they assist people to perceive the difference between good and wrong. These dramatized narratives, regardless of the benefits or drawbacks that are supposedly associated with them, have a tendency to mislead the public by giving the impression that serial killings, which make up less than 2 percent of all murders, are considerably more common than they actually are.